Skip to search
Skip to main content
Catalog
Help
Feedback
Your Account
Library Account
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Search History
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Send
to
SMS
Email
Printer
Bookmark
The Extraordinary African Chambers: Due Process and Judicial Legitimacy
Author/Artist
Salter, Jackson
[Browse]
Format
Senior thesis
Language
English
Availability
Available Online
Citation only:
DataSpace
Copies in the Library
Location
Call Number
Status
Location Service
Notes
Mudd Manuscript Library - Stacks
AC102
Browse related items
On-site access
Reading Room Request
Details
Advisor(s)
Widner, Jennifer A.
[Browse]
Class year
2017
Restrictions note
Walk-in Access. This thesis can only be viewed on computer terminals at the
Mudd Manuscript Library
.
Summary note
Adhering to due process standards is a major challenge for international criminal tribunals. Factors that threaten the exercise of a fair trial include the atrocity of the crimes involved, obstreperous defendants, a constrained court budget, and political obstacles to obtaining witnesses and evidence. At the same time, courts must balance important goals — such as empowering victims, reestablishing peace in affected areas, and promoting the rule of law — with the right to due process. This thesis investigates the fairness of Hissène Habré’s trial before the Extraordinary African Chambers (EAC), a case which has been commended by the media as the first instance of universal jurisdiction in Africa, but has also been criticized for breaches of fairness. An evaluation of due process in this case is helpful to better analyze the case’s legitimacy and legacy in light of other international criminal tribunals. Using interviews with key actors, as well as a analysis of court archives and legal memos, I analyze the degree to which Habré’s trial respected key fair trial standards. I reach the conclusion that the defense was considerably disadvantaged, largely due to the court’s budgetary constraints, temporal limits, and structural shortcomings. This constitutes a breach of equality of arms between the defense and the prosecution. Moreover, this thesis outlines the inherent challenges of reconciling fair trial rights with the interests of victims, and how these issues manifested at the EAC. I demonstrate how balancing mechanisms can be used to reconcile the rights of different actors in international criminal tribunals and why the rights of the accused should remain paramount. Finally, this thesis undertakes a discussion of how to balance the fight against impunity with a concern for fairness. I establish the importance of elevating the position of the defense so that it is on a level playing field with that of the prosecution, and a set of policy recommendations for international criminal tribunals are put forward to promote adherence to due process standards.
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report Harmful Language
Supplementary Information