The Right to be Left Alone as a Moral Heuristic

Author/​Artist
Evans, Michael [Browse]
Format
Senior thesis
Language
English
Description
42 pages

Availability

Available Online

Copies in the Library

Location Call Number Status Location Service Notes
Mudd Manuscript Library - StacksAC102 Browse related items On-site accessReading Room Request

    Details

    Advisor(s)
    Osherson, Daniel [Browse]
    Contributor(s)
    Hasson, Uri [Browse]
    Department
    Princeton University. Department of Psychology [Browse]
    Class year
    2013
    Restrictions note
    Walk-in Access. This thesis can only be viewed on computer terminals at the Mudd Manuscript Library.
    Summary note
    The trolley dilemmas, as proposed by Philippa Foot (1967) and Judith Thomson (1985), are two moral dilemmas that involve making a decision about whether to kill one person to save five. Although the consequences of the dilemmas are identical, they produce divergent responses when people are asked to make the decision. To date, two significant moral principles have emerged that offer some explanation into this divergence of responses between the two dilemmas, the doctrine of the double effect and the contact principle. This paper proposes an alternative moral principle, rooted in Supreme Court Justice Brandeis’s writings, that considers the victim’s level of involvement and innocence in a dilemma, as a partial explanation of the divergence observed between the two dilemmas. The paper attempts to test whether the level of involvement of the characters is a heuristic that plays a role in the moral evaluation process.
    Statement on language in description
    Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage. Read more...

    Supplementary Information