Skip to search
Skip to main content
Catalog
Help
Feedback
Your Account
Library Account
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Search History
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Send
to
SMS
Email
Printer
Bookmark
Does Stereotype Threat Exist in Philosophy? An Examination of Women’s Performance on Philosophic Logic Tasks
Author/Artist
Cruikshank, David
[Browse]
Format
Senior thesis
Language
English
Availability
Available Online
Full text:
DataSpace
Details
Advisor(s)
Fiske, Susan T.
[Browse]
Department
Princeton University. Department of Psychology
[Browse]
Class year
2017
Summary note
Women are highly underrepresented in the field of philosophy, but not much research has examined the mechanisms behind this gender disparity. In contrast, there is a rich wealth of research offering explanations for the underrepresentation of women in STEM. The field specific abilities hypothesis offers a potential link between STEM and philosophy. This suggests that the mechanisms for the gender gap in philosophy may be similar to those in STEM. This experiment tried to determine whether stereotype threat contributed to the underrepresentation of women in philosophy by activating stereotype threat before women performed a standard logic task. The hypothesis was that women would underperform in the stereotype threat condition. Furthermore, framing the question as a narrative as opposed to a pure logic problem would mitigate the effects of stereotype threat for women. The results did not support either hypothesis. There was no significant effect of stereotype threat for women, and women actually performed better in the pure logic condition than they did in the narrative condition. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report Harmful Language
Supplementary Information