Modality and propositional attitudes / Michael Hegarty (Law School Admission Council).

Author
Hegarty, Michael, 1959- [Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Published/​Created
  • Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  • ©2016
Description
vii, 293 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm

Details

Subject(s)
Summary note
"This book shows that the semantic analysis of modal notions of possibility and necessity can be used to enhance our understanding of the interpretation of reports of belief or emotional state. It introduces intuitive notation and terminology to express ideas in modern theories of modal interpretation that are normally represented in complex logical formulas, effectively updates the 1960s-era link between possible worlds and the semantics of propositional attitude ascriptions, and reconciles two disparate views of the role of events in semantic interpretation, that of Donald Davidson and that of David Lewis. It reduces a host of variable behaviors of propositional attitude ascription to an intuitive and precise distinction between ascriptions that merely express a commitment to propositional content versus ones that attribute a mental state to the holder of the propositional attitude. This leads to an explanation of the nature and effects of the language disorder of fluent aphasia"-- Provided by publisher.
Bibliographic references
Includes bibliographical references (pages 276-287)and index.
Contents
Epistemic modality -- Root modality -- Bare attitude ascriptions -- Presupposition filtering and bouletic ascriptions -- Events and states -- Full attitude ascriptions: individuating mental states through propositional content -- Lower interpretation of negation -- Events in epistemic and root modal interpretation -- Attitude ascription in child development and Wernicke's aphasia.
ISBN
  • 9781107085763 ((hardback))
  • 1107085764 ((hardback))
LCCN
2015027884
OCLC
919041830
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage. Read more...
Other views
Staff view

Supplementary Information

Other versions