Fair value accounting, historical cost accounting, and systemic risk : policy issues and options for strengthening valuation and reducing risk / Michael D. Greenberg, Eric Helland, Noreen Clancy, James N. Dertouzos ; supported by the Goldman Sachs Global Markets Institute.

[author
Greenberg, Michael D., 1969- [Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Published/​Created
  • Santa Monica, CA : Rand Corporation, [2013]
  • ©2013
Description
xxi, 86 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm

Availability

Copies in the Library

Location Call Number Status Location Service Notes
Firestone Library - Stacks HF5681.V3 G795 2013 Browse related items Request

    Details

    Subject(s)
    Sponsoring body
    Author
    Summary note
    Fair value accounting (FVA) refers to the practice of updating the valuation of assets or securities on a regular basis, ideally by reference to current prices for similar assets or securities established in the context of a liquid market; historical cost accounting (HCA) instead records the value of an asset as the price at which it was originally purchased. In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, conflicting arguments have been made about the contributions of valuation approaches in triggering the crisis. This report investigates and clarifies the relationship between these two accounting approaches and risks to the financial system. The authors examine the risk implications of FVA and HCA in the various situations in which each is used; assess the role that these accounting approaches have played historically in financial crises, including the 2008 financial crisis, the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s, and the less developed country debt crisis of the 1970s; and explore insights about systemic risk that can be gleaned from better understanding the accounting approaches. The authors find that FVA was probably not a primary driver of the 2008 crisis. Moreover, they suggest that neither FVA nor HCA is objectively ⁰[MARC+62][MARC+65][MARC+74][MARC+74][MARC+65][MARC+72]⁰|(B+ than the other. Instead, both accounting approaches can provide useful information for different contexts when applied rigorously, but when they are implemented poorly or when regulatory oversight is weak, both FVA and HCA can produce misleading information that can increase systemic risk across the financial sector. The authors conclude with a series of recommendations for how FVA and HCA, and the financial information that both methods generate, can be improved to better protect against systemic risk to the banking sector in the future.
    Notes
    • "RAND Center for Corporate Ethics and Governance"
    • "RR-370-CCEG"--Page [4] of cover.
    Bibliographic references
    Includes bibliographical references (pages 81-86).
    Contents
    • Introduction
    • Background: The Debate over FVA and HCA
    • Systemic Risk and Accounting Approaches
    • Accounting Standards and Prudential Regulation
    • Lessons from Historical Episodes Involving Accounting Standards, Systemic Risk, and Financial Crisis
    • Implementation and Risk: The Challenges to Doing FVA and HCA Well
    • Conclusion and Policy Options
    • Appendix: An Overview of HCA and FVA.
    ISBN
    • 0833082124
    • 9780833082121
    Tech. report no.
    RAND/RR-370-CCEG
    LCCN
    2013950607
    OCLC
    858601791
    Statement on language in description
    Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage. Read more...
    Other views
    Staff view