Skip to search
Skip to main content
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Cite
Send
to
SMS
Email
EndNote
RefWorks
RIS
Printer
Bookmark
Department of Defense Rules for Military Commissions [electronic resource] : Analysis of Procedural Rules and Comparison with Proposed Legislation and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Author
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
[Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Published/​Created
[S.l] : [s.n.], 2006.
Description
99 p. : digital, PDF file.
Details
Subject(s)
Administrative law
[Browse]
Constitutional law
[Browse]
Due process of law
[Browse]
Summary note
Compares military commissions envisioned under Military Commission Order No. 1 and general military courts-martial conducted under the Uniform Code of Military Justice; and summarizes DOD rules for military commissions, including jurisdiction, procedural safeguards for the accused, sentencing, and post-trial procedure. Reviews criticism of President Bush's Military Order of Nov. 13, 2001, pertaining to jurisdiction and rights of the accused under Constitutional and international law in connection with the war against terrorism. Summarizes Rumsfeld v. Hamdan case, and provides overview of relevant legislation. Includes comparison of regulations issued by DOD and standard procedures for general courts-martial under the Manual for Courts-Martial.
Notes
CRS Report.
Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
System details
System requirements: PDF reader software.
Other title(s)
ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection.
Statement on responsible collection description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Other views
Staff view
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Supplementary Information