Authoritarian landscapes : popular mobilization and the institutional sources of resilience in nondemocracies / Steve Hess.

Hess, Steve [Browse]
New York : Springer, [2013]
x, 244 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm


Summary note
The turbulent year of 2011 has brought the appearance of mass popular unrest and the collapse of long lived autocratic regimes in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and possibly Syria. The sudden and unanticipated fall of these regimes - often thought of as exemplars of authoritarian resilience - has brought much of the conventional wisdom on the durability and vulnerability of nondemocratic regimes into question. This book seeks to advance the existing literature by treating the autocratic state not as a unitary actor characterized by strength or weakness but rather as a structure or terrain that can alternatively inhibit or facilitate the appearance of national level forms of protests. In the mode of the Arab Spring, the color revolutions of the former Soviet Union, and the people power movement of the Philippines, such movements overcome the daunting impediments presented by autocrats, appeal to likeminded counterparts across society, and overwhelm the ability of regimes to maintain order. Conversely, in other settings, such as contemporary China, decentralized state structures provide an inhospitable environment for national-level protest, leading collective actors to opt for more local and parochial forms of contention. This outcome produces paradoxical situations, such as in the PRC, where protests are frequent but national-level mobilization and coordination is absent.
Dissertation note
Ph. D. Miami University (Oxford, Ohio) 2011
Bibliographic references
Includes bibliographical references (pages 219-239) and index.
Introduction -- Authoritarian landscapes -- Single-party regimes -- Taiwan -- China -- Personalist regimes -- The Philippines -- Kazakhstan -- Conclusion.
  • 1461465362
  • 9781461465362
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage. Read more...
Other views
Staff view

Supplementary Information