Skip to search
Skip to main content
Catalog
Help
Feedback
Your Account
Library Account
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Search History
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Cite
Send
to
SMS
Email
EndNote
RefWorks
RIS
Printer
Bookmark
Counterfeiting Shakespeare : evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye / Brian Vickers.
Author
Vickers, Brian
[Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Published/Created
Cambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Description
xxvii, 568 pages ; 24 cm
Availability
Available Online
Ebook Central Perpetual, DDA and Subscription Titles
Copies in the Library
Location
Call Number
Status
Location Service
Notes
Firestone Library - Stacks
PR2873.F86 V53 2002
Browse related items
Request
Details
Subject(s)
Poetry
—
Authorship
[Browse]
W. S.
—
Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour
[Browse]
Shakespeare, William 1564-1616
—
Authorship
[Browse]
Ford, John 1586-approximately 1640
—
Authorship
[Browse]
Summary note
Counterfeiting Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These attributions have been accepted into certain major editions of Shakespeare's works but Brian Vickers argues that both attributions rest on superficial verbal parallels; both use too small a sample, ignore negative evidence, and violate basic principles in authorship studies. Through a fresh examination of the evidence, Professor Vickers shows that neither poem has the stylistic and imaginative qualities we associate with Shakespeare. He argues that the poet and dramatist John Ford wrote the Elegye: its poetical language (vocabulary, syntax, prosody) is indistinguishable from Ford's, and it contains several hundred close parallels with his work. By combining linguistic and statistical analysis this book makes an important contribution to authorship studies.
Bibliographic references
Includes bibliographical references (p. 554-562) and index.
Contents
Prologue: Gary Taylor finds a poem
pt. I. Donald Foster's 'Shakespearean' Construct. 1. 'W. S.' and the Elegye for William Peter. 2. Parallels? Plagiarisms? 3. Vocabulary and diction. 4. Grammar: 'the Shakespearean "who"'. 5. Prosody, punctuation, pause patterns. 6. Rhetoric: 'the Shakespearean "hendiadys"'. 7. Statistics and inference. 8. A poem 'indistinguishable from Shakespeare'?
pt. II. John Ford's 'Funerall Elegye'. 9. Ford's writing career: poet, moralist, playwright. 10. Ford and the Elegye's 'Shakespearean diction'. 11. The Funerall Elegye in its Fordian context. Epilogue: The politics of attribution
App. I. The text of A Funerall Elegye
App. II. Verbal parallels between A Funerall Elegye and Ford's poems.
Show 2 more Contents items
ISBN
0521772435
9780521772433
9786610160198
6610160198
LCCN
2001052632
OCLC
48265599
International Article Number
9780521772433
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Other views
Staff view
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report Harmful Language
Supplementary Information
Other versions
Counterfeiting Shakespeare : evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye / Brian Vickers. [electronic resource]
id
99125349203006421