Evaluability Assessment and Baseline Study of the Supporting Collective Healing in the Wake of Harm Program, 5 U.S. cities, 2018-2019.

Author
Barrick, Kelle [Browse]
Format
Data file
Published/​Created
Ann Arbor, MI : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, 2024-01-16.
Description
  • 1 online resource
  • V1 (2024-01-16)
  • survey data

Details

Editor
Series
Restrictions note
Use of these data is restricted to Princeton University students, faculty, and staff for non-commercial statistical analysis and research purposes only.
Summary note
The Collective Healing Initiative (CHI) is a demonstration project supporting five law enforcement agencies from Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Houston, Texas, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Rapid City, South Dakota, and Oakland, California. The purpose was to work with their communities to promote collective healing in the wake of traumatic events. The law enforcement agencies worked collaboratively with various community partners and service providers to implement trauma-informed strategies to improve police-community relations, enhance victim services, and promote officer wellness. Researchers conducted an evaluability assessment and baseline study of the CHI using a mixed methods study design including a comprehensive document review, site visits, a capacity and network survey, and a stakeholder survey. Data analyses included a rigorous qualitative analysis of interview data, a social network analysis of grantee and partner collaboration, and a descriptive analysis of stakeholder perceptions of the CHI and the training and technical assistance provided. Findings from each data source were triangulated to develop site descriptions and logic models, assess collaboration and partnerships, conduct evaluability assessments to inform future research and evaluation plans, and assess the training and technical assistance delivered to the sites.
Notes
Although the study included a qualitative analysis of site visit interview data, the Principal Investigators were not able to fully de-identify the interviews while maintaining their usefulness. The NIJ waived the archiving requirement of the qualitative data.
Type of data
survey data
Time and place of event
Data collected 2018-01-01 through 2019-12-31
Funding information
Sponsored by United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2017-VF-GX-0006
Methodology note
Collective Healing grantees and their partners.
Contents
  • Study-Level Files
  • Capacity and Network Survey Data for Table 3-1
  • Capacity and Network Survey Data for Grantee Portion of Table 3-2
  • Capacity and Network Survey Data for Partners Portion of Table 3-2
  • Capacity and Network Survey Data for Grantee Portion of Table 3-3
  • Capacity and Network Survey Data for Partners Portion of Table 3-3
  • Stakeholder Survey Data
Provenance
2024-01-16 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Cite as
Barrick, Kelle, and Tibaduiza, Elizabeth. Evaluability Assessment and Baseline Study of the Supporting Collective Healing in the Wake of Harm Program, 5 U.S. cities, 2018-2019. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2024-01-16. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37624.v1
Statement on responsible collection description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage. Read more...
Other views
Staff view

Supplementary Information