LEADER 02293nam a22003737i 4500001 99130308232406421 005 20240402102857.0 006 m#####o##d######## 007 cr#mn######a#a 008 220629s2024||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d 020 9781009325110 (ebook) 020 |z9781009325103 (paperback) 020 |z9781009494380 (hardback) 035 (UkCbUP)CR9781009325110 040 UkCbUP |beng |erda |epn |cUkCbUP 050 4 QA8.4 |b.S84 2024 082 04 510.1 |223 099 Electronic Resource 100 1 Stanley Tanswell, Fenner, |eauthor. 245 10 Mathematical rigour and informal proof / |cFenner Stanley Tanswell. 264 1 Cambridge : |bCambridge University Press, |c2024. 300 1 online resource (81 pages) : |bdigital, PDF file(s). 336 text |btxt |2rdacontent 337 computer |bc |2rdamedia 338 online resource |bcr |2rdacarrier 347 data file |2rda 490 1 Cambridge elements. Elements in the philosophy of mathematics, |x2399-2883 500 Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 07 Mar 2024). 520 This Element looks at the contemporary debate on the nature of mathematical rigour and informal proofs as found in mathematical practice. The central argument is for rigour pluralism: that multiple different models of informal proof are good at accounting for different features and functions of the concept of rigour. To illustrate this pluralism, the Element surveys some of the main options in the literature: the 'standard view' that rigour is just formal, logical rigour -- the models of proofs as arguments and dialogues -- the recipe model of proofs as guiding actions and activities -- and the idea of mathematical rigour as an intellectual virtue. The strengths and weaknesses of each are assessed, thereby providing an accessible and empirically-informed introduction to the key issues and ideas found in the current discussion. 650 0 Mathematics |xPhilosophy. |0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85082153 650 0 Proof theory. |0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85107437 776 08 |iPrint version: |z9781009494380 830 0 Cambridge elements. |pElements in the philosophy of mathematics |x2399-2883. 956 40 |uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325110