LEADER 04612cmm a22004697i 4500001 99126856939106421 006 m#####o##d######## 007 cr#mn######a#a 008 230307s2023 miu ob 001 0 eng d 035 (MiAaI)ICPSR38271 040 MiAaI |beng |erda |cMiAaI 099 Electronic Resource 245 00 Evaluation of the Philadelphia Police School Diversion Program : |bLong-Term Outcomes and Sustained Impact, 2013-2020 / |cNaomi E.S. Goldstein. 250 2023-02-28 264 1 Ann Arbor, Mich. : |bInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], |c2023. 300 1 online resource. 336 computer dataset |bcod |2rdacontent 337 computer |bc |2rdamedia 338 online resource |bcr |2rdacarrier 347 data file |2rda 490 1 ICPSR |v38271 516 Numeric 530 Also available as downloadable files. 522 Pennsylvania 522 Philadelphia 522 United States 520 3 Schools are a primary referral source to the juvenile justice system, helping create and perpetuate the school-to-prison pipeline. Seeking to dismantle this pipeline in the city, the Philadelphia Police Department (PPD) partnered with the School District of Philadelphia (SDP) and the Philadelphia Department of Human Services (DHS) to develop and operate the Philadelphia Police School Diversion Program. Implemented in May 2014, all first-time offending youth aged 10 years or older who commit specified school-based minor misdemeanor or summary offenses on school property are diverted from arrest, referred to a Department of Human Services (DHS) social worker and community-based services, and face no consequences even if they decline services. This evaluation examined long-term outcomes for diverted youth and sustained program impacts over five years. From a full sample of 3,616 diverted and arrested students, this study used a quasi-experimental design to compare data for diverted youth (quasi-experimental group; n = 1,281) and similar youth arrested in schools in the year before the program's implementation (quasi-control group; n = 531). PPD school police officers completed surveys regarding their knowledge and perceptions of the Diversion Program immediately before and after a training session held prior to its implementation, then on an annual basis through year five. A cost-benefit analysis of the program was conducted in partnership with the Vera Institute of Justice. The data have been organized by analysis. Short-term analysis refers to two-year recidivism analyses and one-year child welfare involvement, and covers the full and quasi-control arrested samples and youth diverted in school years 2014-2015, 2015-2016, and 2016-2017. Long-term analyses include four-year graduation/drop-out, five-year recidivism analyses, and five-year child welfare involvement, and covers the full and quasi-control arrested samples and youth diverted in school year 2014-2015. Short- and long-term recidivism outcome data (DS1 and DS2), police survey data before and after program implementation (DS3), and cost-benefit analysis tables (DS9) are included in this collection. Please refer to the User Guide for details on how to acquire additional data from SDP and DHS and steps to create the full analytic files for academic-related and child welfare involvement outcomes.Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38271.v1 567 1) Students in Philadelphia who were arrested in school or diverted from school-based arrest through the Philadelphia Police School Diversion Program during the study period. 2) Philadelphia Police Department officers working in schools during the time of study. 650 7 Academic Achievement |2icpsr 650 7 Diversion Programs |2icpsr 650 7 Evaluation |2icpsr 650 7 Justice |2icpsr 650 7 Recidivism |2icpsr 650 7 School-To-Prison Pipeline |2icpsr 650 7 Schools |2icpsr 700 1 Goldstein, Naomi E.S. |uDrexel University, |eeditor. 710 2 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, |eissuing body. |0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79141035 830 0 ICPSR (Series) |v38271 956 40 |uhttps://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38271.v1