Skip to search
Skip to main content
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Cite
Send
to
SMS
Email
EndNote
RefWorks
RIS format (e.g. Zotero)
Printer
Bookmark
In praise of ambivalence / D. Justin Coates
Author
Coates, D. Justin
[Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Εdition
First Edition
Published/Created
New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2023]
Description
1 online resource (x, 206 pages).
Details
Subject(s)
Ambivalence
[Browse]
Autonomy
[Browse]
Agent (Philosophy)
[Browse]
Series
Oxford Academic
[More in this series]
Oxford scholarship online
Summary note
Ambivalence is a form of inner volitional conflict that we experience as being irresolvable without significant cost. Because of this, very few of us relish feelings of ambivalence. Yet for many in the Western philosophical tradition, ambivalence is not simply an unappealing experience that's hard to manage. According to the unificationists, ambivalence is a failure of well-functioning agency. The reasons for this, we're told, are threefold. First, ambivalence precludes agents from resolving their wills in a way that is necessary for autonomy. Second, ambivalence precludes agents from fully affirming their lives, and in particular from fully affirming the choices they make. As a result, it robs them of an important source of meaning. Finally, ambivalence causes agents to act in self-defeating ways. In so doing, they act without integrity. Ambivalence is thus seen as a threat to a trio of important agential goods, and as a result, it imperils the best forms of human agency. In Praise of Ambivalence argues that ambivalence does not preclude volitional resolution or normatively significant forms of affirmation. Nor does it guarantee self-defeat. Consequently, ambivalence as such is no threat to autonomy, meaning, or integrity. In the course of assessing these arguments, ambivalence is also revealed to have an important role in securing the very goods that unificationists contend it undermines. The best forms of human agency are therefore shown not only to be compatible with ambivalence but to frequently require it. Ambivalence is thus not a volitional defect, but a crucial constituent of well-functioning agency.
Notes
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Contents
Contents: Acknowledgments - 1. Introduction - Part I. A House Divided - 2. Ambivalence - 3. Resolving the Will - 4. Affirmation and Ambivalence - 5. Ambivalence without Self-Defeat - 6. Ambivalence and Integrity - Part II. A Wise Inconsistency - 7. Normative Competence and Ambivalence - 8. Morality and Meaningfulness - 9. Conclusion: Being Large, Containing Multitudes - Works Cited - Index.
ISBN
0-19-765241-7
0-19-765242-5
0-19-765240-9
Statement on responsible collection description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Other views
Staff view
Need Help?
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report a Missing Item
Supplementary Information
Other versions
In praise of ambivalence / D. Justin Coates.
id
99126764912906421
In praise of ambivalence / D. Justin Coates.
id
99126739972106421