LEADER 03402cmm a22004097i 4500001    99126232466806421
006    m#####o##d########
007    cr#mn######a#a
008    221212s2022    miu     o     001 0 eng d
035    (MiAaI)ICPSR37212
040    MiAaI |beng |erda |cMiAaI
099    Electronic Resource
245 00 Evaluation of the OJJDP FY2010 Second Chance Act Juvenile Offender Reentry Demonstration Projects, 5 United States cities, 2010 / |cAkiva Liberman.
250    2022-11-10
264  1 Ann Arbor, Mich. : |bInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], |c2022.
300    1 online resource
336    computer dataset |bcod |2rdacontent
337    computer |bc |2rdamedia
338    online resource |bcr |2rdacarrier
347    data file |2rda
490 1  ICPSR |v37212
516    Numeric
536    United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice |c2012-RY-BX-0013
530    Also available as downloadable files.
522    Oklahoma
522    United States
522    Virginia
520 3  In response to growing concerns about recidivism and the welfare of youth who return to communities from incarceration, the federal government passed the Second Chance Act (SCA) in 2008 to authorize funding to support the development, implementation, and evaluation of juvenile reentry programs (H.R. 1593, 110th Cong. 2007). Since then, more than 100 juvenile SCA awards have been made to grantees across the U.S. to improve reentry programming and outcomes for youth returning home after placement in juvenile correctional institutions (State Government Justice Center, 2017). The purpose of this evaluation was to evaluate five FY2010 juvenile SCA grantees who were funded to implement comprehensive reentry programs for high-risk youth, and to provide policymakers, practitioners, and funders with empirical evidence about the degree to which the SCA program effectively reduced recidivism and improved reintegration outcomes for youth offenders, and to inform future comprehensive juvenile reentry efforts. Specific goals of this study included: identifying strong sites for an impact evaluation; assessing the extent to which the sites successfully implemented a comprehensive and integrated model of juvenile reentry for a high-risk, high-needs population; assessing program operations and adherence to reentry principles; evaluating the impact of the SCA programs; determining the cost effectiveness of the SCA programs, and their cost-benefit in terms of crime prevented; and disseminating evaluation findings to practitioner and researcher audiences. Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37212.v1
567    Juvenile offenders in Tidewater, VA and Tulsa, OK.
650  7 evaluation |2icpsr
650  7 juvenile justice |2icpsr
650  7 juvenile offenders |2icpsr
650  7 youths |2icpsr
700 1  Liberman, Akiva |uUrban Institute, |eeditor. |0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no97042730
710 2  Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. |0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79141035
830  0 ICPSR (Series) |v37212
956 40  |uhttps://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37212.v1