LEADER 03223cmm a22004097i 4500001    99126232466206421
006    m#####o##d########
007    cr#mn######a#a
008    221212s2022    miu     o     001 0 eng d
035    (MiAaI)ICPSR37889
040    MiAaI |beng |erda |cMiAaI
099    Electronic Resource
245 00 Kentucky Juvenile Justice Reform Evaluation : |bAssessment of Community-Based Services for Justice-Involved Youth, 2011-2019 / |cSarah Vidal.
250    2022-12-05
264  1 Ann Arbor, Mich. : |bInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], |c2022.
300    1 online resource
336    computer dataset |bcod |2rdacontent
337    computer |bc |2rdamedia
338    online resource |bcr |2rdacarrier
347    data file |2rda
490 1  ICPSR |v37889
516    Numeric
536    United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention |c2016-JF-FX-0058
530    Also available as downloadable files.
522    Kentucky
522    United States
520 3  In 2014, Kentucky undertook a reform of the state's juvenile justice system through Senate Bill 200 (SB 200). The SB 200 legislation sought to improve systems and youth outcomes by expanding access to treatment and supervision in the community, focusing the most intensive resources on serious offenders, and enhancing data collection and oversight mechanisms to ensure that the policies work. Westat, in partnership with the American Probation and Parole Association, worked with Kentucky agencies to evaluate key reforms under SB 200. Evaluation consisted of three components. First, an implementation evaluation documented barriers and successes to implementation, with a particular focus on the Family Accountability, Intervention and Response (FAIR) teams and the impacts of system-wide sociopolitical context, allocation of resources, agency leadership and organizational culture on the reform. Second, using geographic information systems (GIS), researchers assessed the availability of community-based services for youth referred to the juvenile justice system in Kentucky and also identified gaps in service areas and potential disparities in access to services. Third, researchers conducted an outcome evaluation to assess the effect of SB 200 on youth dispositional outcomes and racial and ethnic disparities among referred, diverted, and adjudicated youth.Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37889.v2
567    Kentucky justice-involved youth and Kentucky state and local agency officials
650  7 corrections |2icpsr
650  7 diversion programs |2icpsr
650  7 juvenile crime |2icpsr
650  7 juvenile justice |2icpsr
650  7 youthful offenders |2icpsr
700 1  Vidal, Sarah |uWestat Inc, |eeditor.
710 2  Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. |0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79141035
830  0 ICPSR (Series) |v37889
956 40  |uhttps://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37889.v2