Skip to search
Skip to main content
Catalog
Help
Feedback
Your Account
Library Account
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Search History
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Cite
Send
to
SMS
Email
EndNote
RefWorks
RIS
Printer
Bookmark
Evaluating campaign quality : can the electoral process be improved? / L. Sandy Maisel, Darrell M. West, Brett M. Clifton. [electronic resource]
Author
Maisel, Louis Sandy, 1945-
[Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Published/Created
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Description
1 online resource (xiv, 155 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).
Availability
Available Online
Ebook Central Perpetual, DDA and Subscription Titles
Cambridge Core All Books
Details
Subject(s)
Political campaigns
—
United States
[Browse]
Elections
—
United States
[Browse]
Author
West, Darrell M., 1954-
[Browse]
Clifton, Brett M., 1972-
[Browse]
Series
Communication, society and politics.
[More in this series]
Summary note
For a number of years, voters and academic observers have been dissatisfied with a number of elements of American campaigns. Contemporary races are seen as too negative, too superficial, and too unfair or misleading. Based on these complaints, a variety of reform organizations have targeted millions of dollars to improve the situation. Through their efforts and those within the academic community, a wide range of reform initiatives have been undertaken, such as voluntary codes of conduct, industry self-regulation, certificate programs, tougher ethics rules for consultants, and the encouragement of more substantive venues. This book seeks to evaluate whether these activities have improved the level of campaign discourse and conduct in US House and Senate campaigns and argues that while individual reform efforts have achieved some of their stated objectives, the overall effect of these reform efforts has been disappointing.
Notes
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 08 Oct 2015).
Bibliographic references
Includes bibliographical references (p. 145-151) and index.
Language note
English
Contents
Preface
Campaign reformers: optimists, skeptics, and rejectionists
Dissemination of campaign practices
Impact on campaign conduct
Impact on campaign discourse
Impact on public perceptions
Improving the system
Appendices: A. Data and methodology
B. Public opinion survey
C. Consultant survey
Focus group protocol.
Show 8 more Contents items
ISBN
1-107-18293-X
1-280-91730-X
9786610917303
0-511-29049-7
0-511-28989-8
0-511-28861-1
0-511-32244-5
0-511-61120-X
0-511-28929-4
OCLC
173240513
772458617
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Other views
Staff view
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report Harmful Language
Supplementary Information
Other versions
Evaluating campaign quality : can the electoral process be improved? / L. Sandy Maisel, Darrell M. West, Brett M. Clifton.
id
99113495883506421
Evaluating campaign quality : can the electoral process be improved? / L. Sandy Maisel, Darrell M. West, Brett M. Clifton.
id
9951904003506421