Skip to search
Skip to main content
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Cite
Send
to
SMS
Email
EndNote
RefWorks
RIS
Printer
Bookmark
Attacking Judges : How Campaign Advertising Influences State Supreme Court Elections / Melinda Gann Hall.
Author
Hall, Melinda Gann
[Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Εdition
1st ed.
Published/Created
Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, [2020]
©2014
Description
1 online resource (264 p.)
Details
Subject(s)
Judges
—
Election
—
United States
[Browse]
Advertising, Political
—
Law and legislation
—
United States
[Browse]
Courts of last resort
—
States
—
United States
[Browse]
Political questions and judicial power
—
States
—
United States
[Browse]
Series
Stanford Studies in Law and Politics
[More in this series]
Summary note
Nasty, below-the-belt campaigns, mudslinging, and character attacks. These tactics have become part and parcel of today's election politics in America, and judicial elections are no exception. Attacking Judges takes a close look at the effects of televised advertising, including harsh attacks, on state supreme court elections. Author Melinda Gann Hall investigates whether these divisive elections have damaging consequences for representative democracy. To do this, Hall focuses on two key aspects of those elections: the vote shares of justices seeking reelection and the propensity of state electorates to vote. In doing so, Attacking Judges explores vital dimensions of the conventional wisdom that campaign politics has deleterious consequences for judges, voters, and state judiciaries. Countering the prevailing wisdom with empirically based conclusions, Hall uncovers surprising and important insights, including new revelations on how attack ads influence public engagement with judicial elections and their relative effectiveness in various types of state elections. Attacking Judges is a testament to the power of institutions in American politics and the value of empirical political science research in helping to inform some of the most significant debates on the public agenda. This book's results smartly contest and eradicate many of the fears judicial reformers have about the damaging effects of campaign negativity in modern state supreme court elections.
Notes
Description based upon print version of record.
Source of description
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 23. Jul 2020)
Language note
English
Contents
Front matter
Contents
Tables and Figures
Preface and Acknowledgments
1. Attacking Judges
2. State Supreme Court Elections in Contemporary Democracy
3. Campaign Advertising in State Supreme Court Elections
4. Attack Advertising and Electoral Support for State Supreme Court Justices
5. Attack Advertising and Citizen Participation in State Supreme Court Elections
6. State Supreme Court Elections Are Different—by Design
Notes
References
Index
Show 10 more Contents items
ISBN
0-8047-9309-3
LCCN
2014012610
OCLC
1178769420
Doi
10.1515/9780804793094
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Other views
Staff view
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report Harmful Language
Supplementary Information
Other versions
Attacking judges : how campaign advertising influences state supreme court elections / Melinda Gann Hall.
id
9988773063506421