The First Amendment, Democracy, and Romance / Steven H. Shiffrin.

Author
Shiffrin, Steven H. [Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Εdition
Course Book
Published/​Created
  • Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, [2014]
  • ©2014
Description
1 online resource (296 p.)

Details

Subject(s)
Series
Summary note
If an organizing symbol makes sense in First Amendment jurisprudence, it is not the image of a content-neutral government, argues Steven Shiffrin, nor is it a town-hall meeting or even a robust marketplace of ideas. If the First Amendment is to have an organizing symbol, let it be an Emersonian symbol: let it be the image of the dissenter.Originally published in 1993.The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
Notes
Originally published: Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1990.
Bibliographic references
Includes bibliographical references (p. [173]-279) and index.
Source of description
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 08. Jul 2019)
Language note
In English.
Contents
  • Frontmatter
  • Acknowledgments
  • Contents
  • Introduction
  • 1. The First Amendment and Social Engineering
  • 2. The First Amendment and Democracy
  • 3. The First Amendment and Dissent
  • 4. The First Amendment and Method
  • 5. The First Amendment and Romance
  • Notes. Index
Other format(s)
Issued also in print.
ISBN
1-4008-6346-5
OCLC
  • 889254417
  • 979595076
Doi
  • 10.1515/9781400863464
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage. Read more...
Other views
Staff view

Supplementary Information