Hard reading : learning from science fiction / Tom Shippey.

Author
Shippey, T. A. [Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Εdition
1st ed.
Published/​Created
Liverpool : Liverpool University Press, 2016.
Description
1 online resource (xvi, 334 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).

Details

Subject(s)
Series
Summary note
The fifteen essays collected in Hard Reading argue, first, that science fiction has its own internal rhetoric, relying on devices such as neologism, dialogism, semantic shifts, the use of unreliable narrators. It is a "high-information" genre which does not follow the Flaubertian ideal of le mot juste, "the right word", preferring le mot imprévisible, "the unpredictable word". Both ideals shun the facilior lectio, the "easy reading", but for different reasons and with different effects.

The essays argue further that science fiction derives much of its energy from engagement with vital intellectual issues in the "soft sciences", especially history, anthropology, the study of different cultures, with a strong bearing on politics. Both the rhetoric and the issues deserve to be taken much more seriously than they have been in academia, and in the wider world.Each essay is further prefaced by an autobiographical introduction. These explain how the essays came to be written and in what ways they (often) proved controversial. They, and the autobiographical introduction to the whole book, create between them a memoir of what it was like to be a committed fan, from teenage years, and also an academic struggling to find a place, at a time when a declared interest in science fiction and fantasy was the kiss of death for a career in the humanities.
Notes
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 11 Aug 2017).
Bibliographic references
Includes bibliographical references (pages 311-319) and index.
Target audience
Specialized.
Funding information
Knowledge Unlatched
Language note
English
Contents
  • Cover
  • Contents
  • Figures
  • Note on References
  • A Personal Preface
  • What SF Is
  • 1 Introduction Coming Out of the Science Fiction Closet
  • Learning to Read Science Fiction
  • 2 Introduction Rejecting Gesture Politics
  • Literary Gatekeepers and the Fabril Tradition
  • 3 Introduction Getting Away from the Facilior Lectio
  • Semiotic Ghosts and Ghostlinesses in the Work of Bruce Sterling
  • SF and Change
  • 4 Introduction Getting Serious with the Fans
  • Science Fiction and the Idea of History
  • 5 Introduction Getting to Grips with the Issue of Cultures
  • Cultural Engineering: A Theme in Science Fiction
  • 6 Introduction And Not Fudging the Issue!
  • "People are Plastic": Jack Vance and the Dilemma of Cultural Relativism
  • 7 Introduction SF Authors Really Mean what they Say
  • Alternate Historians: Newt, Kingers, Harry and Me
  • 8 Introduction A Revealing Failure by the Critics
  • Kingsley Amis's Science Fiction and the Problems of Genre
  • 9 Introduction A Glimpse of Structuralist Possibility
  • The Golden Bough and the Incorporations of Magic in Science Fiction
  • 10 Introduction Serious Issues, Serious Traumas, Emotional Depth
  • The Magic Art and the Evolution of Words: Ursula Le Guin's "Earthsea" Trilogy
  • SF and Politics
  • 11 Introduction A First Encounter with Politics
  • The Cold War in Science Fiction, 1940-1960
  • 12 Introduction Language Corruption, and Rocking the Boat
  • Variations on Newspeak: The Open Question of Nineteen Eighty-Four
  • 13 Introduction Just Before the Disaster
  • The Fall of America in Science Fiction
  • 14 Introduction Why Politicians, and Producers, Should Read Science Fiction
  • The Critique of America in Contemporary Science Fiction
  • 15 Introduction Saying (When Necessary) the Lamentable Word.
  • Starship Troopers, Galactic Heroes, Mercenary Princes: The Military and its Discontents in Science
  • References
  • Index.
ISBN
  • 1-78694-516-9
  • 1-78138-439-8
OCLC
  • 1138064726
  • 956277478
Doi
  • 10.3828/9781781382615
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage. Read more...
Other views
Staff view

Supplementary Information