Details

Subject(s)

• United States—Armed Forces—Procurement [Browse]
• United States—Armed Forces—Weapons systems [Browse]

Related name

• United States. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering [Browse]
• Friedmann, E.T., (Ellen Taratoot), 1950- [Browse]

Series

R (Rand Corporation) [More in this series]

Summary note

Critics of weapon system acquisition frequently claim that management process changes during the 1960s and 1970s caused the acquisition cycle to lengthen. A review of three classes of aerospace systems--aircraft, missiles, and helicopters--shows that over the past 30 years the time from the beginning of full scale development to delivery of the first operational item has changed only slightly, but average production rates have fallen by half. The planning phase corresponding to today's Phase I (from Milestone I to Milestone II) has nearly doubled, and the introduction of Phase Zero may have added still more time, but evidence on Phase Zero effects is still tenuous. Opportunities for shortening the acquisition cycle time appear to lie mainly in flexible application of the regulations governing approval of the Mission Element Need Statement (MENS), and in some cases the Services should be allowed to proceed simultaneously with Phase Zero, and even Phase I, studies while the MENS is being reviewed.

Notes

• "A report prepared for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the United States Air Force."
• "November 1980."

Tech. report no.

R-2605-DR & E/AF

Statement on responsible collection description

Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage. Read more...