Skip to search
Skip to main content
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Cite
Send
to
SMS
Email
EndNote
RefWorks
RIS format (e.g. Zotero)
Printer
Bookmark
Ability Tracking, School Competition, and the Distribution of Educational Benefits / Dennis Epple, Elizabeth Newlon, Richard Romano.
Author
Epple, Dennis
[Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Published/​Created
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2000.
Description
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Details
Related name
National Bureau of Economic Research
[Browse]
Newlon, Elizabeth
[Browse]
Romano, Richard
[Browse]
Series
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w7854.
[More in this series]
NBER working paper series no. w7854
Summary note
To study the effects of ability grouping on school competition, we develop a theoretical and computational model of tracking in public and private schools. We examine tracking's consequences for the allocation of students of differing abilities and income within and between public and private schools. Private schools tend to attract the most able and wealthiest students, and rarely track in equilibrium. Public sector schools can maximize attendance by tracking students. Public schools retain a greater proportion of higher-ability students by tracking, but lose more wealthy, lower-ability students to the private sector. Consequently, socioeconomic status is a predictor of track assignment in public schools. For the entire population, public-sector tracking has small aggregate effects on achievement and welfare, but results in significant redistribution from lower- to higher-ability students.
Notes
August 2000.
Source of description
Print version record
Statement on responsible collection description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Other views
Staff view
Need Help?
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report a Missing Item
Supplementary Information