Skip to search
Skip to main content
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Cite
Send
to
SMS
Email
EndNote
RefWorks
RIS
Printer
Bookmark
2005 Report Card for America's Infrastructure
Author
American Society of Civil Engineers
[Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Published/Created
Reston, Virginia : ASCE Press, 2005.
Description
1 online resource (196 pages)
Details
Subject(s)
Infrastructure (Economics)
—
United States
[Browse]
Civil engineering
—
United States
[Browse]
Public works
—
United States
—
Evaluation
[Browse]
Public works
—
United States
—
Maintenance and repair
[Browse]
Summary note
Prepared by the 2005 Report Card for America's Infrastructure Advisory Council of ASCE. The 2005 Report Card for America's Infrastructure seeks to inform the public and policy makers about the condition of the nation's infrastructure and how best to improve it. ASCE assembled a panel of 24 leading civil engineers who analyzed hundreds of studies and reports and surveyed more than 2,000 engineers to determine what was happening in the field. The report card evaluates 15 categories of infrastructure by assigning letter grades that are based on physical condition and needed fiscal investments for improvement. In addition, a state-by-state assessment summarizes the top three infrastructure concerns and key infrastructure facts for each state. With a cumulative grade of D, the 2005 Report Card finds that not much has changed since the previous report card of four years ago. Topics include: aviation, bridges, dams, drinking water, energy, hazardous waste, navigable waterways, public parks and recreation, rail, roads, schools, security, solid waste, transit, and wastewater.
Source of description
Print version record.
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Other views
Staff view
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report Harmful Language
Supplementary Information