Skip to search
Skip to main content
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Cite
Send
to
SMS
Email
EndNote
RefWorks
RIS
Printer
Bookmark
Changing Attitudes and Motivation in Parolees (CHAMPS) Pilot Study in Dallas, Denver, and Des Moines, 2015-2016 / Erin Jacobs Valentine, Louisa Treskon, Cindy Redcross.
Format
Book
Language
English
Εdition
2018-09-17
Published/Created
Ann Arbor, Mich. : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2018.
Description
1 online resource
Numeric
Availability
Available Online
ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research)
Details
Related name
Valentine, Erin Jacobs
[Browse]
Treskon, Louisa
[Browse]
Redcross, Cindy
[Browse]
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
[Browse]
Library of Congress genre(s)
Braille books
[Browse]
Series
ICPSR (Series) 37091
[More in this series]
ICPSR 37091
Summary note
These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. This study examined the implementation of a pilot parole-based intervention, known as the Next Generation of Parole Supervision (NG). Drs. Caleb Lloyd and Ralph Serin developed the NG model with funding from the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), and the National Institute of Corrections developed the NG curriculum for parole officers to implement. The Bureau of Justice Assistance funded the implementation of NG in three study sites: Dallas, Texas; Denver, Colorado; and Des Moines, Iowa. This mixed-methods study focused on understanding how NG was implemented as it was piloted in the three sites, and assessed NG-trained parole officers' fidelity to the NG model. In order to better understand NG's implementation and the business as usual practices it was intended to replace, the study also included a second group of parole officers who were not trained in NG. The groups were not randomly assigned. Data collected for this study included interview data, parole officer questionnaires related to concepts of the NG curriculum, coaching logs providing measures of whether officers received coaching and its frequency, video recordings of parole supervision meetings, and parole caseload data. Demographic variables included as part of this collection are parole officers' age and sex, and site location. The data collection includes 3 SAS data files: Parole officer-level data (archive_raf170831_po): Includes 31 cases and 26 variables. Video-level data (archive_raf170831_video): Includes 241 cases and 15 variables. Questionnaire-level data (archive_raf180719_tests): Includes 50 cases and 8 variables. Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37091.v1
Notes
Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2018-10-01.
Type of data
Numeric
Geographic coverage
Colorado
Dallas
Denver
Des Moines
Iowa
Texas
United States
Funding information
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2010-RY-BX-0002
Methodology note
Parole officers willing to participate in the CHAMPS study, who were not about to retire, not completely resistant to using new corrections strategies with their parolees, and did not have specialized caseloads (e.g., mental health or intensive supervision) in any of the three study sites: Dallas, TX; Denver, CO; and Des Moines, IA during the study time period of 2015-2016.
Other format(s)
Also available as downloadable files.
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Other views
Staff view
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report Harmful Language
Supplementary Information