Skip to search
Skip to main content
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Cite
Send
to
SMS
Email
EndNote
RefWorks
RIS
Printer
Bookmark
Assessing the Effectiveness of Four Juvenile Justice Interventions on Adult Criminal Justice and Child Welfare Outcomes, Ohio, 2004-2008 / Lisa Callahan
Format
Book
Language
English
Εdition
2018-03-21
Published/Created
Ann Arbor, Mich. : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2018.
Description
1 online resource
Numeric
Details
Related name
Callahan, Lisa
[Browse]
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
[Browse]
Library of Congress genre(s)
Braille books
[Browse]
Series
ICPSR ; 36130
[More in this series]
Summary note
These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. This study compared the adult criminal justice and child welfare system outcomes of four pathways through the juvenile justice system - Traditional Probation, Intensive Probation, Specialty Court Docket (Crossroads Program), and commitment to state youth correction services (Department of Youth Services). The study compared the effectiveness of a continuum of services and supervision in improving public safety, including re-arrest and re-incarceration, and in improving outcomes in engagement with child welfare as parents, including child welfare complaints and dispositions. The core research question is: "what is the relative effectiveness of four different juvenile justice interventions on improving public safety and child welfare outcomes?" The study population is all youths (n=2581) who entered the juvenile court from 2004-2008. It then included 7-10 years of follow-up in the adult justice and child welfare systems for all youths. The four interventions are on a continuum of intensity of services and supervision with Traditional Probation having the fewest services followed by Intensive Probation, Crossroads, and Division of Youth Services commitment. The study's deposits include 14 SPSS data files: arrest_final.sav CW_Custody_Adult_final.sav, CW_Custody_child_final.sav, CW_Intakes_Adult_final.sav, CW_Intakes_child_final.sav, CW_Placements_adult_final.sav, CW_Placements_child_final.sav, General_final.sav, Jail_final.sav, JC_charges_final.sav, JC_detention_final.sav, JC_disposition_final.sav, JC_Gal_final.sav prison_final.sav. Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36130
Notes
Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2018-04-23.
Type of data
Numeric
Geographic coverage
Ohio
Funding information
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2012-IJ-CX-0041
Methodology note
All youths who entered the Summit County Juvenile Court (OH, United States) from 1/1/2004 through 12/31/2008, including 7-10 years of follow-up in the adult justice and child welfare systems for all youths.
Other format(s)
Also available as downloadable files.
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Other views
Staff view
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report Harmful Language
Supplementary Information