Skip to search
Skip to main content
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Cite
Send
to
SMS
Email
EndNote
RefWorks
RIS
Printer
Bookmark
State Laws and Child Custody Recommendations in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence, 2009-2010 [United States] / Daniel Saunders
Format
Book
Language
English
Εdition
2018-03-19
Published/Created
Ann Arbor, Mich. : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2018.
Description
1 online resource
Numeric
Details
Related name
Saunders, Daniel
[Browse]
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
[Browse]
Library of Congress genre(s)
Braille books
[Browse]
Series
ICPSR ; 36594
[More in this series]
Summary note
These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. This study was a secondary analysis of Custody Evaluators' Beliefs about Domestic Abuse Allegations, 2009-2010 [United States] (ICPSR 30962 - https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30962). The purpose of this study was to conduct further analysis of a recent, National Institute of Justice (NIJ) sponsored national survey of professionals to better understand the relationship between family law statutes and professionals' recommendations for child custody and visitation in cases of intimate partner violence. The samples involve 512 child custody evaluators and 200 judges from 46 states. Evaluators and judges responded to a case vignette of serious intimate partner violence (IPV). They indicated recommendations they would make for custody and visitation and the perceived risk of future harm. Evaluators also reported on their history of actual recommendations in IPV cases. The original study investigated beliefs about custody, value-laden beliefs, knowledge professionals had acquired on IPV, the number of survivors they had known, and their work setting, education, and other demographics. In the current study, statutory provisions with sufficient sample sizes of professionals with and without the provisions were used in the analysis.Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36594
Notes
Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2018-04-23.
Type of data
Numeric
Geographic coverage
United States
Funding information
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2014-IJ-CX-0018
Methodology note
Family law judges and child custody evaluators within the United States.
Other format(s)
Also available as downloadable files.
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Other views
Staff view
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report Harmful Language
Supplementary Information