Blind Collaborative Justice Survey, 2014 [UNITED STATES] [electronic resource] / Carolyn Wong, Eyal Aharoni

Format
Data file
Language
English
Εdition
2017-06-29
Published/​Created
Ann Arbor, Mich. : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2017
Description
Numeric

Details

Series
ICPSR ; 35258 [More in this series]
Restrictions note
AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.
Summary note
These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they there received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except of the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompany readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collections and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. This study conducted an experimental investigation of two potential contributors to invalid testimony within adversarial litigation involving forensic evidence. First, the experts' knowledge of their party representation (i.e., prosecution vs. defense counsel), and secondly the lack of input from the relevant scientific community. The study used an experimental survey design with a realistic criminal case to examine the effects of blinding experts to their party representation and consensus feedback from a panel of experts to quantify and reduce testimonial bias. Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35258
Notes
Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2017-07-03.
Type of data
Numeric
Geographic coverage
United States
Funding information
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2013-IJ-CX-0002
System details
Mode of access: Intranet.
Methodology note
People with an advanced degree in a relevant scientific field where training would normally include exposure to Bayes theorem or equivalent experience.
Contents
Dataset
Other format(s)
Also available as downloadable files.
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage. Read more...
Other views
Staff view

Supplementary Information