Skip to search
Skip to main content
Catalog
Help
Feedback
Your Account
Library Account
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Search History
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Cite
Send
to
SMS
Email
EndNote
RefWorks
RIS
Printer
Bookmark
Analysis of Current Cold-Case Investigation Practices and Factors Associated with Successful Outcomes, 2008-2009 [electronic resource] Robert C. Davis, Carl Jensen, Karin E. Kitchens
Format
Data file
Language
English
Εdition
2016-12-19
Published/Created
Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2016
Description
Numeric
Details
Related name
Davis, Robert C.
[Browse]
Jensen, Carl
[Browse]
Kitchens, Karin E.
[Browse]
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
[Browse]
Series
ICPSR; 33761
[More in this series]
Restrictions note
AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.
Summary note
These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they there received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except of the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompany readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collections and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. To assess the current practices in cold-case investigations, this study utilized a national online survey of law enforcement agencies (Cold Case Survey Data, n = 1,051) to document the range of ways in which cold-case work is conducted and assess how this organization affects cold-case clearance rates. In November 2008, the chiefs of police in the sample were sent a letter explaining the purpose of the survey and inviting them to participate. Potential respondents were directed to the web-based survey instrument through a provided web address. The results from the national survey were used to select sites for an analysis of case files. Researchers chose three jurisdictions that conducted a large number of cold-case homicide investigations: the District of Columbia, Baltimore, Maryland, and Dallas, Texas (Cold Case Homicide Data, n = 429). To these three sites, researchers added Denver, Colorado (Cold Case Sexual Assault Data, n = 105) because it had received a Department of Justice grant to conduct testing of DNA material in sexual assault cold cases. At all four sites, cold cases were examined for seven categories of data including victim's characteristics, crime context, motivation, human capital, physical evidence, basis for cold-case investigations and cold-case actions. Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33761
Notes
Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2017-01-09.
Type of data
Numeric
Geographic coverage
Baltimore
Colorado
Dallas
Denver
District of Columbia
Maryland
Texas
United States
Funding information
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2007-DN-BX-0014
System details
Mode of access: Intranet.
Methodology note
The universe for the Cold Case Survey Data is the police chiefs of all police agencies in the United States in November 2008. The universe for the Cold Case Homicide Data includes all cold-case homicide investigations in the District of Columbia, Baltimore, Maryland, and Dallas, Texas between 2008 and 2009. The universe for the Cold Case Sexual Assault Data includes all cold-case sexual assault cases with a DNA match in Denver, Colorado between 2008 and 2009.
Contents
Dataset
Other format(s)
Also available as downloadable files.
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Other views
Staff view
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report Harmful Language
Supplementary Information